health · HHS-OPHS
Rigorous Impact Evaluation of Programs to Prevent Teen Pregnancy and Achieve Optimal Health
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health · AH-TP2-26-001
Award Range
$650K – $1.3M
Total Program Funding
$8.3M
Expected Awards
9
Deadline
July 23, 2026
GRANTQUICK SUMMARYPlain-English Overview
HHS/OPA is funding 9 grants ($650K-$1.25M each, $8.3M total) for rigorous impact evaluations of teen pregnancy prevention programs. Unlike the replication grants (which implement proven programs), these fund RESEARCH — randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs testing whether a program actually prevents teen pregnancy and achieves health outcomes. You're running the study, not just the program.
Who Should Apply
Universities, research organizations, evaluation firms, or large nonprofits with rigorous evaluation expertise (RCT or quasi-experimental design capacity). Must partner with organizations implementing TPP programs to evaluate their effectiveness.
Who Should NOT Apply
Organizations that only want to run a program (use the replication grant), groups without research methodology expertise, small nonprofits without evaluation capacity, or anyone proposing non-rigorous evaluation designs.
Key Requirements (Plain English)
- •Must conduct rigorous impact evaluation (RCT or quasi-experimental design)
- •Must evaluate programs targeting teen pregnancy prevention and adolescent health
- •Must use scientifically valid methodology
- •Must contribute to the evidence base for what works
- •U.S. Territories specifically eligible
- •No cost-sharing required
💡 GrantQuick Tip
9 awards for evaluation research means OPA wants geographic and programmatic diversity. The winning proposals have: (1) a specific program to evaluate that shows PROMISE but lacks rigorous evidence, (2) a research design that can detect meaningful effects (large enough sample, appropriate comparison group), and (3) a community partner already implementing the program. Don't propose evaluating a program that already has strong RCT evidence — they want to BUILD the evidence base, not confirm what's already known. Programs serving underrepresented populations (LGBTQ+ youth, tribal communities, rural teens) are priority.
Competitiveness: Moderate — 9 awards in the evaluation research community. Requires both research methodology expertise and community implementation partnerships.
What This Grant Funds
Attachments
Who Can Apply
Eligible Applicant Types
Funding Details
- Minimum Award
- $650K
- Maximum Award
- $1.3M
- Total Program Funding
- $8.3M
- Expected Number of Awards
- 9
- Cost Sharing Required?
- No
- Funding Instrument
- cooperative_agreement
Key Dates
Applications must be submitted electronically no later than 6:00 pm Eastern Time.
Agency Contact
Jaclyn Ruiz Jaclyn.Ruiz@hhs.gov
Jaclyn.Ruiz@hhs.govReady to apply?
View the full NOFO and submit your application on Grants.gov